Write a paper arguing the rationality of federal vaccine mandates in public schools based on the scientific research and social critique.
Imagine that you are a member of Congress voting on a bill to make FDA-approved vaccinations a federal requirement for all public schools. The legislation would nullify the individual state laws that have varied mandates and exemptions.
In your bill, make sure you back your claims with data driven evidence. This should not be an I feel argument. Consider financial costs, religious and health exemptions, and legalities of federal vs state mandates.
In your paper, you should:
– Argue the rationality of federal vaccine mandates in public schools based on the scientific research and social critique. Make sure to Talk back to the opposing argument/position with data. Identify specific data (rates, probability, mean, etc.) to support your argument. Include at least 5 varied data points to integrate into your analysis
-Explain your interpretation of the two valid data visualizations you selected in Module 3 Week 7 to support your argument. Critique a misleading data visualization. (See attached)
-Discuss the implications of supporting or not supporting the bill mandating federal mandates for vaccines in public schools. What health implications does it make? What are the financial costs, supported by the data you researched? What might the cultural effects be? Who would benefit most from such a provision? What harm or backlash could you foresee from passing such a law? .
Paper requirements:
-Statement of position
-Cited statistics supporting this position
-Appropriately cited use of three (3) published data visualizations
-Interpretation of data visualizations and critique of a misleading one
-Critical assessment of the collective data and information sourced.
Paper Formatting (standard):
-At least 2 pages of text (500 words, excluding reference list and charts/data visualization)
-1 Margins
-Standard font (i.e. 12pt Times New Roman, Calibri)
-Introduction Body Conclusion
-3 Data visualizations (cited)
-Reference List
-APA formatting
Solved by verified expertVaccines have been one of the most significant public health interventions in the history of medicine. They have contributed significantly to the prevention and control of infectious diseases, which have been a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite their effectiveness, there has been a significant increase in vaccine hesitancy in recent years, which has led to outbreaks of preventable diseases. One of the measures adopted by governments to address this issue is the implementation of vaccine mandates in public schools. This paper argues that federal vaccine mandates in public schools are rational and necessary based on scientific research and social critique.
Scientific Research
The scientific evidence in favor of vaccines is overwhelming. Vaccines have been shown to be safe, effective, and the best tool for preventing the spread of infectious diseases. Vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to produce antibodies against specific pathogens, which protect individuals from getting sick. Vaccines have been instrumental in the eradication of diseases such as smallpox and the control of diseases such as polio, measles, mumps, rubella, and pertussis.
Vaccine hesitancy has been fueled by misinformation and myths about vaccines. Some people believe that vaccines are not safe or that they can cause autism, despite multiple studies refuting these claims. T
Looking for a similar assignment?
Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services
A study published in Pediatrics found that vaccine mandates were associated with higher vaccination rates and lower rates of vaccine-preventable diseases. The study compared vaccination rates and disease incidence in states with and without vaccine mandates and found that states with vaccine mandates had higher vaccination rates and lower rates of vaccine-preventable diseases. Another study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that vaccine mandates were associated with a reduction in vaccine-preventable diseases and a decrease in healthcare costs.
Social Critique
In addition to the scientific evidence in favor of vaccines, there are social critiques that support the implementation of vaccine mandates in public schools. One of the critiques is the idea of the social contract. The social contract is the implicit agreement between individuals and society in which individuals give up some of their freedoms in exchange for protection and security provided by the government. In the case of vaccine mandates, individuals are required to get vaccinated to protect themselves and others from infectious diseases. Vaccines are a public good, and everyone benefits when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated.
Another social critique is the idea of the common good. The common good is the idea that society as a whole should benefit from policies and actions taken by the government. In the case of vaccine mandates, the common good is achieved by protecting public health and preventing outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccines not only protect individuals who get vaccinated but also those who cannot get vaccinated due to medical reasons. By increasing vaccination rates, vaccine mandates protect vulnerable populations and promote social justice.
Conclusion
In conclusion, federal vaccine mandates in public schools are rational and necessary based on scientific research and social critique. Vaccines are safe, effective, and the best tool for preventing the spread of infectious diseases. Vaccine hesitancy has contributed to the resurgence of preventable diseases, and vaccine mandates have been shown to be an effective way to increase vaccination rates and prevent outbreaks. Vaccine mandates are also supported by social critiques such as the social contract and the common good. By implementing vaccine mandates in public schools, the government is fulfilling its obligation to protect public health and promote social justice.
