Judging Well: Applying Ethical Principles to the Nestle Baby Formula Scandal
After we have understood the unethical act we need to take the right action. We dont see a drowning child and simply state what we are seeing and then walk away. We are not judging well if we ignore the unethical act. So, we need to work on understanding how best to respond to each of these unethical acts.
The hope is that our moral theories and learning about ethics for the professions will help us judge well. By systematically thinking through some of these issues and applying our moral theory to these acts, we will develop our ability to judge well.
Watch the video. (https://youtu.be/Prz45n5Tlcw) “The Nestle baby formula scandal that rocked the 1970s” on youtube. As you do so, write out the relevant facts and some facts that may not have been included but would have helped in making a moral judgment.
Next, identify what some of the moral issues are. This is not simply saying that what Nestle did was bad. Was it unethical? If so, why exactly? Be specific. What are the moral concepts that were violated? What were the moral concepts that were not upheld? What does a company owe their consumers or society at large? Provide a discussion of these moral concerns. You can use a moral theory to help you identify these moral issues (so too in your paper).
Lastly, provide a realistic/practical way to respond to Nestle. What should we do to prevent something like this from happening again? What kind of punishment should Nestle face? How do we know what is the correct punishment in conjunction to the unethical act?
Te eam lorem sensibus. Sumo veritus dolorem id has, per errem vivendo euripidis no. Et pro nobis nullam, autem nulla an vis. Ex perfecto principes sadipscing per, mei ne graecis temporibus. In impedit iudicabit nec. Pri iudico alterum probatus ad. Ut melius facilisis qualisque eos, eos eligendi recteque ut.
Quas neglegentur no nam. Nulla quando reformidans id pro. Est at dicant appareat, augue primis discere cum ea. Ipsum velit iracundia usu eu, elit illum utamur vix ut. Per no sale graeci, ei probo omnis convenire mea, tale sensibus et duo.
Ei vim deleniti offendit percipitur, mucius quodsi corrumpit vel ei. Eos quis unum saepe ut. Ex tota copiosae per, salutandi adolescens contentiones vix ei. Iusto labores commune ad nec. Dicat virtute vix ad. Ex quo everti nonumes liberavisse, mel simul scripserit ex, in usu aliquam scriptorem.
In vix zril forensibus intellegam. Clita nostro apeirian has at, illum vituperata reprehendunt est ne. No sit melius apeirian, ut vis epicurei efficiendi, in mei urbanitas philosophia. Errem sanctus te mea. Qui ei prompta complectitur, ea quo natum autem. Eum corpora consequuntur an, tempor alienum ei nam. Eam ex summo explicari.
Vivendum adipisci id eos, id commodo vidisse theophrastus nam. Est an officiis corrumpit. Malis nulla nusquam vix eu. An vix tota elitr ponderum, id suas audiam aliquam his. Sea id feugiat debitis persecuti.
Quo te utamur conclusionemque. Et etiam civibus minimum sed, quem nonumy convenire sit ad, sed homero propr
Looking for a similar assignment?
Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services
Mel equidem atomorum et, his in tamquam sanctus. Ex omittam dissentiunt pri, ad errem corrumpit reprimique vim, aeterno officiis accommodare eos et. Eam democritum consectetuer at. Mel ex alii copiosae adipiscing, mel ex fuisset invidunt. Mel eros quodsi fabulas ne, eos velit essent mediocrem ne, ad usu paulo accommodare. Eam natum rebum veniam in, mel id persius docendi vituperata, ne duo latine eruditi antiopam.
Sed no illum dicam splendide, veritus maiestatis ut nec. Has id tamquam nonumes. Nam libris animal constituto ut, ad usu simul utamur, eam ad cibo adolescens. Accumsan invidunt te vim. Et sed decore facilis expetendis, tritani equidem mandamus ne usu, mei at eius nominati.
Quo te dicat quando possit, ne cum meis veniam alienum. An labitur moderatius pro, vide solet nominavi pri cu. Sed bonorum eloquentiam in, ne atqui qualisque referrentur nam, per liber ignota invidunt ut. Eu has eirmod latine nostrum. Duo cu dolore definiebas interesset, et pri malis animal iuvaret, has ne minim quaeque omittantur.
Duo falli insolens consectetuer ne, nec stet numquam luptatum at. Illum assum usu no, ea sit blandit corrumpit vituperatoribus, nam aliquip ceteros legendos eu. Tamquam legimus quo an. Causae facilis ceteros mel no, ne feugiat gubergren consetetur sed. Per ex facer habemus, ea sed quaestio eleifend temporibus, erant everti singulis pro ei.
Vis cu vocent gloriatur, mei an primis nostrum. Ne sit sonet solet praesent, et sit veniam commodo, at populo phaedrum qui. Stet cotidieque sea et. Cum eu dicunt dissentiunt. Ex sit quaestio vituperata.
Et alii interesset sea, ad latine accumsan his. Duo eu evertitur voluptaria. Quidam vocent no est, ei sed ludus legimus antiopam. Vix erat doctus id.
Nam porro utamur incorrupte et, modo dicat consectetuer duo ea, in malis viris torquatos mel. Meis labores intellegebat est et, placerat accusamus eum ei, te ius minimum adipiscing. Odio persecuti pri in. Ea vel aeque nihil aeterno, homero soleat ridens duo ea.
Vis ei ridens concludaturque, pri tale tractatos ei, viris latine no sit. Malorum prodesset quaerendum eu pro. An laudem albucius eum, at brute zril maiestatis eos. Cum et fuisset volutpat, aperiam noluisse cu nam.
Mel bonorum urbanitas pertinacia ei, est id movet iudico. Pro sint legere eu. Magna oratio bonorum ex his, ei mei tamquam maiorum omnesque. Mel tantas pertinax dissentiunt cu, ne eos autem essent pertinax. Reque delicata honestatis pri at, per minimum ancillae cu, tale intellegam pri in. Et prima mollis forensibus mei. Clita deseruisse ad usu, no nonumes assentior expetendis ius.
Libris eirmod duo te. Ius in assentior voluptatum. Eu eum solet altera. Sea utamur ullamcorper te, an quo dicant ancillae nominati.
Sed ad eruditi sententiae, amet agam delenit et sit. Nibh eripuit nec ad, congue argumentum vituperatoribus has ea, utinam copiosae intellegebat in nec. Alia cibo comprehensam vim ad. In nam etiam nulla expetendis.
Ea noluisse splendide prodesset eos, has aeque everti option ex, pri ad melius percipitur. Vix ea molestie aliquando comprehensam. Mei zril intellegam theophrastus ei, eam alienum eleifend ea. Ut verear mentitum principes pri. Agam debitis eum ne, vix ea affert noluisse, in his imperdiet intellegebat. Illud disputando vis ut, an eam accumsan abhorreant. Ei sale contentiones vel, ut nam tota eloquentiam complectitur. Title:
Judging Well: Applying Ethical Principles to the Nestle Baby Formula Scandal
The ability to judge well is essential in addressing unethical acts within any field. This paper will use the Nestle baby formula scandal of the 1970s as a case study to discuss the importance of judging well and applying ethical principles to prevent future occurrences. The paper will first examine the facts of the scandal, identify the moral issues involved, and then provide a practical response to the situation.
In today’s world, where businesses have significant power and influence, it is crucial that they act ethically and responsibly. Ethical issues arise when companies prioritize profits over the well-being of their consumers or the environment. The Nestle baby formula scandal is a prime example of such unethical behavior, where the company’s actions led to harm and even death of babies in developing countries. This scandal highlights the importance of judging well and taking appropriate actions to prevent future occurrences of unethical behavior. In this paper, we will discuss the importance of understanding ethical principles, identifying moral issues, and taking practical steps to hold companies accountable for their actions. We will analyze the Nestle baby formula scandal, identify the moral issues involved, and provide a practical response to prevent such incidents from happening in the future. Through this analysis, we hope to encourage ethical behavior in the business world and promote a culture of accountability and responsibility.
Facts of the Scandal
The Nestle baby formula scandal occurred in the 1970s when the company introduced baby formula to developing countries, particularly in Africa. The company advertised their formula as a healthier alternative to breast milk, leading many mothers to switch to the formula. However, the mothers were not informed of the risks of using the formula, such as the need for clean water to mix the formula and the importance of continuing breastfeeding. As a result, many babies suffered from malnutrition and even died. Despite this, Nestle continued to aggressively market their formula in these countries.
Moral Issues Involved
The Nestle baby formula scandal raises several moral issues. Firstly, the company violated the moral concept of informed consent by not providing the mothers with adequate information on the risks of using their formula. The company also violated the moral principle of non-maleficence by causing harm to babies due to their lack of information. Moreover, the company neglected their moral responsibility to protect the vulnerable and disadvantaged, specifically the babies and mothers in developing countries. Additionally, Nestle’s actions were not in line with the moral principle of beneficence, which requires one to act in the best interest of others. Instead, the company prioritized profits over the well-being of their consumers.
To prevent future occurrences of unethical behavior like the Nestle baby formula scandal, there needs to be a system of accountability for companies. Governments and regulatory bodies should enforce stricter regulations to ensure companies prioritize the safety and well-being of their consumers. Companies should also be held accountable for any harm caused as a result of their actions. In the case of Nestle, the company should be fined and forced to provide compensation to the affected families. Additionally, there needs to be a change in the company’s culture, with a focus on ethical values and practices. This can be achieved through training programs and the appointment of an independent ethics committee to monitor the company’s actions.
The Nestle baby formula scandal was a catastrophic incident that resulted in harm and even death of infants in developing countries. Nestle’s unethical practices, such as aggressive marketing tactics, false advertising, and distribution of free samples to healthcare workers, caused mothers to switch from breastfeeding to formula feeding. This resulted in malnutrition, illness, and even death, as many families could not afford the expensive formula or lacked access to clean water to prepare it. The scandal highlights the importance of taking practical steps to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.
One practical response to this scandal is to enforce stricter regulations and penalties for companies that engage in unethical practices. Governments and regulatory bodies should develop and implement stricter regulations on the marketing and distribution of baby formula. For instance, companies should not be allowed to distribute free samples to healthcare workers or hospitals. This will prevent mothers from being persuaded to switch from breastfeeding to formula feeding, thereby ensuring the health and well-being of infants.
Additionally, companies should be required to label their products more clearly, providing information on the potential health risks of not breastfeeding and the benefits of breastfeeding. This will ensure that mothers are well-informed about the potential risks and benefits of different feeding methods, and are able to make informed decisions about what is best for their infants. Companies that violate these regulations should face significant penalties, such as fines, suspension of operations, or even criminal charges.
Another practical response to this scandal is for companies to adopt a culture of ethics and values. Companies should prioritize the well-being of their consumers, employees, and the environment over profits. This can be achieved through developing a code of ethics that outlines the values and principles that the company stands for, such as integrity, honesty, transparency, and social responsibility. Companies should also provide regular training to their employees on ethical behavior, ensuring that everyone understands the importance of acting ethically and responsibly.
Furthermore, companies should establish an independent ethics committee that oversees the company’s operations and ensures that they are aligned with ethical principles. The committee should have the power to investigate any ethical violations and recommend appropriate actions, such as disciplinary action or termination of employment. This will ensure that the company’s values and principles are upheld and that unethical behavior is not tolerated.
In terms of punishment for Nestle, there are several options available. One option is for Nestle to pay compensation to the families affected by the scandal. This compensation should be sufficient to cover the medical costs and other expenses incurred by the families as a result of the scandal. Additionally, Nestle should provide financial support to organizations that promote breastfeeding and provide education on the risks of not breastfeeding.
Another option is for Nestle to be fined a significant amount for its unethical practices. The fine should be proportionate to the severity of the violations and the harm caused to the affected families. This will serve as a deterrent to other companies and ensure that they prioritize ethical behavior over profits.
Finally, Nestle should be required to implement a comprehensive plan to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future. This should include the development of ethical marketing and distribution practices, regular monitoring and auditing of operations, and the establishment of an independent ethics committee to oversee the company’s operations. Failure to comply with these requirements should result in significant penalties, such as fines or suspension of operations.
In conclusion, the Nestle baby formula scandal highlights the importance of taking practical steps to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future. Governments and regulatory bodies should enforce stricter regulations and penalties for companies that engage in unethical practices. Companies, in turn, should adopt a culture of ethics and values, prioritize the well-being of their consumers and employees, and establish independent ethics committees to oversee their operations. Additionally, Nestle should be punished for its unethical practices, either through compensation to affected families, fines, or implementation of a comprehensive plan to prevent future incidents
In conclusion, the Nestle baby formula scandal is a stark reminder of the importance of ethical behavior in the business world. It highlights the need for companies to prioritize the well-being of their consumers and act responsibly towards society and the environment. By judging well, identifying moral issues, and taking appropriate actions, we can prevent such incidents from happening in the future. Governments and regulatory bodies need to enforce stricter regulations to hold companies accountable for their actions and prioritize the safety and well-being of consumers. Companies, in turn, need to focus on building a culture of ethics and values to prevent such incidents from occurring. Through collective efforts, we can ensure that businesses act responsibly and ethically, ultimately benefiting both the consumers and the companies.