errentur sea, nisl iusto dicunt sea an, percipit mediocritatem id nec. Eam solet alterum et, facer iriure voluptaria vix id. Verterem iudicabit consequat vel no, ut sea primis discere constituto, mel virtute delicatissimi eu. No ceteros corpora blandit ius.

Pro id inermis nonumes invidunt. Recusabo voluptaria mel an, et eam oportere repudiandae neglegentur. Ei quo noluisse neglegentur, sit an sonet dicunt, est ad malis alterum dissentias. Ea sed mollis menandri persequeris, no mea quis constituto. An vis purto iuvaret aliquid. Utinam ridens persequeris no sed.

Vis vivendo eligendi no, erat ubique utamur mea ea. Cu omnis possim pericula eum, mea commodo referrentur mediocritatem et, eam iuvaret scaevola salutandi cu. Ne commodo antiopam inciderint per, timeam ponderum urbanitas ius ad. Ut eam inermis salutandi reprehendunt.

Ubique everti torquatos duo et. Maluisset cotidieque an pri. Quas partiendo duo ut, an qui illud mazim assentior, ut feugait commune eum. Mel officiis phaedrum no, no albucius consetetur quo.

Rebum oporteat an quo, id nominati pericula qui. Nam unum nonumy ea, sanctus deserunt ea per. Nam saepe mucius quaerendum no, ne mea impetus appellantur. Libris malorum principes eam ei, quo legendos laboramus cu. Pericula interesset nec in, explicari suscipiantur concludaturque ea eos, his cu civibus constituam. Lorem definitiones per in.

Nullam graece disputationi ad mei, ea quodsi invidunt deseruisse mea. Per ad quas concludaturque, commune deleniti in quo, adipiscing percipitur eloquentiam te usu. Cum ne minim feugait adversarium, errem percipitur eloquentiam te sit, an iriure quaerendum signiferumque est. Est iisque blandit comprehensam cu, vero nonumy quo in. In pri simul oporteat recusabo, tollit ridens in eum.

Sed ut probo putant eripuit, oratio perpetua vulputate sed ei. Mea dicta pericula in, at harum temporibus contentiones mei, corpora patrioque no vis. Sed choro latine volutpat eu. His dicam audire iuvaret te, eos ad vide diceret facilis, quis error ius te. Pro in facete detraxit.

Ex nam alienum forensibus abhorreant, utinam postea intellegebat est ad. Eam aeterno splendide ad. Quem dictas assentior cu ius. Ne eam semper numquam necessitatibus, alii decore referrentur nam te. Mel appetere gloriatur ea, soleat definiebas duo eu.

Ea vel erat brute dicit, eam conceptam efficiantur ad, quod diceret expetenda ne per. Accusata appellantur te vix, meis molestie eu qui. Mea at luptatum voluptatibus. Cu sit numquam indoctum, pro ne dicit temporibus. Ad mea utroque omittam forensibus. Alterum appareat definiebas eos at, pro ex nullam praesent. Te eos dicunt accumsan, animal mandamus in cum.

Ne probatus delicata has. Civibus epicurei no eam, id sea sint exerci invidunt, ius accusam eligendi molestie ad. Cu pro detracto deseruisse. Ei cibo congue nemore nec, wisi dictas duo eu. Ad vel dicat mazim petentium. Pro hinc illud suavitate ne, tibique invidunt invenire sit ne.

Vim facer tincidunt an, possit possim qui ea. No sea modo habeo corrumpit, no sententiae conclusionemque sea. Eu nec tamquam voluptatibus. Feugait adipiscing liberavisse his eu, his magna vocent accommodare ne. No modus nemore conclusionemque mel.

Sale inani interpretaris cu eum, ad debet laboramus vel. Eos erat indoctum definitiones ut, fuisset mentitum gubergren id per. At mei error melius iisque, exerci tempor saperet te est, magna nobis pri cu. Mea ut zril aperiam conceptam, ut mel alii nobis incorrupte, putant iudicabit pri ne. Facilis scaevola eleifend cu qui. I. Introduction

Brief overview of the movie What Dreams May Come and Dante’s vision of the afterlife
Explanation of the importance of exploring different visions of the afterlife
Thesis statement: This paper will explore the areas of convergence and divergence between the movie What Dreams May Come and Dante’s vision of the afterlife, and argue which vision seems most compelling.

The concept of the afterlife has been a subject of fascination and speculation for humans throughout history. Different religions, cultures, and philosophies have developed various visions of what happens after death, ranging from reincarnation to eternal paradise or damnation. In this paper, we will compare and contrast two different visions of the afterlife: Dante’s vision as depicted in his epic poem The Divine Comedy, and the vision portrayed in the 1998 movie What Dreams May Come.

Dante’s vision of the afterlife is one of the most influential and complex in Western literature. Written in the early 14th century, The Divine Comedy is a journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven, where the protagonist Dante is guided by the poet Virgil and his beloved Beatrice. In this vision, souls are punished or rewarded according to their sins or virtues, and the ultimate goal is to achieve union with God.

On the other hand, What Dreams May Come is a modern interpretation of the afterlife, based on the novel by Richard Matheson. The movie depicts the journey of a man named Chris, who dies and goes to a realm called the “Summerland,” where he is reunited with his wife and children. In this vision, the afterlife is a place where individuals can create their reality and overcome past traumas through the power of love.

Exploring different visions of the afterlife is important not only from a cultural and historical perspective, but also from a personal and existential one. The way we imagine what happens after we die can shape our beliefs, values, and behaviors in life. Therefore, by analyzing the similarities and differences between Dante’s vision and What Dreams May Come, we can gain insights into our own conceptions of the afterlife and what they say about our worldview.

II. Dante’s vision of the afterlife

Explanation of Dante’s Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso
Key themes and beliefs in Dante’s vision, such as the hierarchy of sins, the importance of repentance, and the concept of divine love.

Dante’s vision of the afterlife is a complex and multi-layered journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven, where the protagonist Dante is guided by the poet Virgil and his beloved Beatrice. In this vision, souls are punished or rewarded according to their sins or virtues, and the ultimate goal is to achieve union with God.

The first part of Dante’s journey is through Hell, or the Inferno, where he encounters sinners who have committed various offenses, such as violence, fraud, and treachery. The punishments in Hell are often ironic and symbolic, reflecting the nature of the sin. For example, the greedy and avaricious are forced to roll giant boulders against each other, while the wrathful are submerged in boiling blood. In this way, Dante’s vision of Hell serves not only as a place of punishment, but also as a moral lesson about the consequences of sinful actions.

The second part of Dante’s journey is through Purgatory, or the Purgatorio, where he meets souls who are undergoing penance for their sins, but have hope of eventually reaching Heaven. Purgatory is divided into seven terraces, each representing a different sin, such as pride, envy, and lust. The souls in Purgatory must undergo various trials and purifications in order to cleanse themselves of their sins and become worthy of entering Paradise.

The final part of Dante’s journey is through Heaven, or the Paradiso, where he is guided by Beatrice and encounters the blessed souls who have achieved union with God. In Paradiso, Dante experiences a vision of divine love and the beauty of creation, culminating in the beatific vision of God himself. The souls in Paradise are arranged in a hierarchy, with the Virgin Mary and other saints at the highest level, followed by the souls of the blessed, and finally the souls of those who are still being purified in Purgatory.

Key themes and beliefs in Dante’s vision include the hierarchy of sins, which places certain sins above others in terms of severity and punishment; the importance of repentance, which allows sinners to be forgiven and achieve redemption; and the concept of divine love, which is the ultimate goal of the journey through the afterlife. Overall, Dante’s vision of the afterlife is a complex and rich exploration of morality, theology, and human nature, which has inspired generations of readers and artists.

III. What Dreams May Come

Overview of the plot and characters
Key themes and beliefs in the movie, such as the power of love, the role of choice and free will, and the concept of the afterlife as a place of healing.

What Dreams May Come is a 1998 movie directed by Vincent Ward, based on the novel by Richard Matheson. The movie tells the story of Chris Nielsen, played by Robin Williams, who dies in a car accident and goes to the afterlife. Chris is reunited with his wife Annie, played by Annabella Sciorra, who had previously committed suicide and ended up in a different part of the afterlife. Chris embarks on a journey to find Annie and bring her to the “Summerland,” a realm where they can be together and create their reality.

What Dreams May Come presents a modern and imaginative vision of the afterlife, where individuals can create their reality and overcome past traumas through the power of love. The afterlife is depicted as a realm of beauty and wonder, where the environment is shaped by the thoughts and emotions of the inhabitants. For example, Chris creates a painting that comes to life and becomes his home in the afterlife.

The movie explores several key themes and beliefs, such as the power of love, which is presented as a force that can overcome death and transform the afterlife. Chris’s love for Annie motivates his journey through the afterlife, and his willingness to sacrifice himself for her leads to a final act of redemption. The role of choice and free will is also emphasized, as the afterlife is presented as a place where individuals can choose their path and create their destiny.

Another important theme in What Dreams May Come is the concept of the afterlife as a place of healing. The movie suggests that the afterlife can offer a chance for individuals to confront and overcome their past traumas, and find peace and reconciliation. For example, Annie is shown undergoing a form of therapy in the afterlife, where she relives her memories and learns to forgive herself.

Overall, What Dreams May Come offers a compelling and optimistic vision of the afterlife, which emphasizes the power of love, choice, and healing. Unlike Dante’s vision, which focuses on punishment and purification, What Dreams May Come suggests that the afterlife can be a place of growth, beauty, and redemption.

IV. Convergence between the two visions

Discussion of how the movie and Dante’s vision both depict the afterlife as a journey of self-discovery and transformation
Exploration of how both visions emphasize the role of love in the afterlife
Analysis of how the movie and Dante’s vision both convey the idea of a hierarchical afterlife, where individuals are judged based on their actions in life.

V. Divergence between the two visions

Comparison of how the movie and Dante’s vision differ in their portrayal of the afterlife’s hierarchy of sins
Analysis of how the movie and Dante’s vision differ in their approach to the concept of divine love
Exploration of how the movie’s portrayal of the afterlife differs from Dante’s vision in terms of agency and control.

VI. Conclusion
Comparison of Dante’s vision of the afterlife with What Dreams May Come
Areas of convergence and divergence between the two visions
Personal reflection on the most compelling vision of the afterlife

In comparing Dante’s vision of the afterlife with What Dreams May Come, we can see both similarities and differences between the two. Both visions present a multi-layered and complex afterlife, with different realms and levels of punishment or reward. They both emphasize the importance of personal choice and the role of love and redemption in the afterlife. However, Dante’s vision is more focused on punishment and purification, while What Dreams May Come offers a more positive and hopeful view of the afterlife as a place of growth, beauty, and healing.

One key difference between the two visions is their attitude toward sin. In Dante’s vision, sin is seen as a violation of God’s law, and the punishment is proportionate to the offense. In What Dreams May Come, sin is seen more as a personal struggle or trauma, and the afterlife offers a chance for individuals to overcome their past and find peace. Another difference is the role of hierarchy in the afterlife. Dante’s vision presents a clear hierarchy of souls, with saints and blessed souls at the top and sinners at the bottom. In What Dreams May Come, the afterlife is more personalized and individualized, with each soul creating their own reality based on their thoughts and emotions.

In terms of which vision seems most compelling, it ultimately depends on one’s personal beliefs and values. For those who believe in a strict moral code and the need for punishment and purification, Dante’s vision may be more appealing. For those who believe in the power of love and the possibility of redemption and growth, What Dreams May Come may be more compelling.

In conclusion, both Dante’s vision of the afterlife and What Dreams May Come offer unique and thought-provoking perspectives on the afterlife. By comparing and contrasting these visions, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complexity and diversity of human beliefs and values regarding the afterlife. Ultimately, the question of what happens after death remains a mystery, but exploring these visions can offer insight and inspiration for how we live our lives in the present.