Read and respond to the article The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South by Alfred Conrad and John Meyer.

Read and respond to the article The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South by Alfred Conrad and John Meyer. Some historians and others have argued that slavery was a dying institution in the mid-1800s and that it would have died out on its own even if the Civil War had not been fought. Discuss how the findings of Conrad and Meyer address this argument on the viability (or lack thereof) of an economy based on slave labor. Would slavery have gone away without the coercive correction of the Civil War?

Answer & Explanation

Solved by verified expert

Alfred Conrad and John Meyer’s article, “The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South,” provides a comprehensive analysis of the economic implications of slavery in the Southern United States prior to the Civil War. The authors argue that while slavery was profitable for slave owners, it also had a number of negative economic effects on the broader Southern economy.

One of the key arguments made by Conrad and Meyer is that slavery led to a concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a small group of wealthy slave owners. This concentration of wealth, they argue, was a major impediment to economic development in the South, as it stifled competition and innovation. Moreover, the authors suggest that the high levels of inequality created by

Looking for a similar assignment?

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services

Place your order

Step-by-step explanation

slavery contributed to political instability, which further hindered economic growth.

Another important point made by the authors is that slavery was a highly inefficient system of labor. Because slaves had no financial incentive to work harder or more efficiently, they were often less productive than free workers. Additionally, the high costs associated with owning and maintaining slaves (including the cost of feeding, clothing, and housing them) further reduced the economic efficiency of the system.

Despite these inefficiencies, however, the authors acknowledge that slavery was highly profitable for slave owners. This profitability was due in large part to the fact that slaves were a fixed cost, which meant that slave owners could control their labor costs more effectively than free labor employers could. Additionally, because slaves were considered property, they could be bought and sold like any other commodity, which created a lucrative market for slave traders and brokers.

Overall, Conrad and Meyer’s article provides a nuanced and insightful analysis of the economic implications of slavery in the Ante Bellum South. While slavery was undoubtedly profitable for some, the authors argue that it also had a number of negative economic consequences, including the concentration of wealth and power, political instability, and labor inefficiency. By examining these factors, the authors help to shed light on the complex relationship between slavery and economic development in the United States.

Download PDF