How does Thoreau justify the moral need for civil disobedience?

Thoreau combines his arguments about why people should practice civil disobedience with personal anecdotes and discussions specific to his own time and place. Is this a rhetorically useful approach? Why or why not?
In what ways is Thoreau’s essay based on the concepts of individualism and self- reliance?
How does Thoreau justify the moral need for civil disobedience? What principles does he rely on in his justification?

Answer & Explanation
VerifiedSolved by verified expert
Henry David Thoreau argues in his essay “Civil Disobedience” that individuals have a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Thoreau believes that the government is often corrupt and immoral, and that citizens have a duty to resist such injustices.

Thoreau argues that individuals have a responsibility to act according to their own conscience, even if it means breaking the law. He writes, “It

Looking for a similar assignment?

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services

Place your order

Step-by-step explanation
is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.”

Thoreau also believes that individuals have a responsibility to act as agents of change, rather than simply following the status quo. He argues that citizens must actively resist unjust laws and work towards changing them, rather than waiting for the government to do so.

Thoreau’s justification for civil disobedience is based on the principle of individual freedom and the inherent dignity of each person. He argues that individuals must be willing to stand up for their beliefs, even if it means going against the majority or the government. For Thoreau, civil disobedience is a necessary component of a just and free society.

Download PDF